By: Som-Mai Nguyen
Date: April 24, 2025
Illustrations: Nguyen Tran
This photograph, often described as the most harrowing image from the war, serves as a critical touchstone for discussions about free speech in the age of social media.
Chances are you might have encountered this image before: a stark black-and-white photograph featuring Vietnamese children fleeing, flanked by soldiers. In the forefront, a distressed child cries, but the central focus is on a 9-year-old girl—naked, weeping, and wailing in pain from severe burns. Known as “The Terror of War,” it’s more widely recognized as the Napalm Girl photograph.
The attack that prompted the children’s flight was a tragic case of friendly fire by South Vietnamese forces, utilizing American aircraft and napalm to target Northern Vietnamese combatants. This iconic image, taken by Huỳnh Công “Nick” Út in June 1972 near Trảng Bàng, just northwest of what is now Ho Chi Minh City, earned him a Pulitzer Prize.
Some argue that “The Terror of War” was pivotal in swaying American public opinion, hastening a withdrawal from the conflict, ultimately leading to the Paris Peace Accords in January 1973. While the photograph undoubtedly made a profound impact, it’s worth noting that sentiment had shifted even before its publication; a Gallup poll from June 1971 revealed that 61% of Americans believed sending troops to Vietnam was a mistake—a considerable increase from the 24% who felt that way in 1965.
If the Napalm Girl photograph contributed to the war’s conclusion, it was in the context of a broader shift in media technology that reshaped public perceptions of war. From the mid-1950s until 1973, the U.S. engaged heavily in Southeast Asia, but advancements in television and photojournalism made the war’s brutal realities more visible than ever, generating a powerful public outcry that redefined antiwar activism as mainstream cultural discourse, embraced by scholars, musicians, and film stars alike.
It’s no surprise that this period led to significant legal cases regarding free speech. The Pentagon Papers case exemplifies this, as the Nixon administration sought to silence the media exposing the war’s atrocities—while many legal battles concerning antiwar protests shaped rights related to students’ protest activities and public expressions of profanity.
Just as Nixon faced challenges in managing speech, today’s government also confronts criticism regarding freedom of expression, with initiatives expanding surveillance on social media dissent among noncitizens. This ongoing struggle illustrates the transformation of political discourse into a primarily online battleground marked by complex and often opaque content moderation policies. Here, the legacy of the Vietnam War continues to resonate.
“The Terror of War” is a strikingly violent and nonconsensual nude image of a child—a significant historical artifact that poses difficult questions regarding free speech. It has repeatedly surfaced in debates about content moderation policies as platforms grapple with how to manage such sensitive material. Despite lacking a definitive court ruling for precedent, the Napalm Girl photograph has had a lasting impact on the governance of expression.

<div class="_1a883yp1 vg3sjf2" WPAuto_Base_Read